na muche

 *

(...)

Arguments about feminism representing only an elite slice of the female demographic have existed for as long as feminism itself, and there is certainly an argument that Girls is a missed opportunity in this regard. But the show never set out to be a feminist tract, nor a depiction of universal experience. It is about Dunham's own experience, and the fact that so many people expected more, and were then disappointed, reflects how keen – commendably so – many people are for pop culture to move forward and reflect a broader spectrum of women's lives. Yet as Dunham says in the pilot episode, she might not be the voice of her generation, but she is "a voice of a generation". A funny, smart and exciting voice. Ultimately, it is a credit to Dunham and the potential people see in her that some have been so disappointed.

She hasn't made a show that will change feminism, race relations or TV in general. She's just made a show about some girls – not all girls, just some girls. And, for now, that's enough.

Hadley Freeman in The Guardian

(cedido pelo outro habitante da casa do diospireio)

 *

para ler o artigo completo da hadley freeman, aqui

para ler sobre as girls no diospireio, aqui